Steve Wynn, FARA, foreign agent registration, Steve Wynn appeal, US Court of Appeals, foreign lobbying, FARA enforcement, Steve Wynn lawsuit, Justice Department, Guo Wengui extradition, DC Circuit Court, foreign influence, legal precedent, transparency in lobbying
Steve Wynn, the casino magnate, has won an appeal in a landmark Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) case. The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit upheld a lower court’s dismissal of a civil lawsuit that sought to compel Wynn to register as a foreign agent due to his alleged lobbying efforts for the Chinese government. This ruling has significant implications for FARA enforcement and the future of foreign lobbying transparency in the United States.
Steve Wynn Wins Appeal in Foreign-Lobbying Case: A Landmark Decision on FARA Compliance
In a significant legal victory for casino magnate Steve Wynn, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit upheld a lower court’s decision to dismiss a civil lawsuit brought by the US government. The suit sought to compel Wynn to register as a foreign agent due to his alleged lobbying efforts on behalf of the Chinese government. This ruling has broad implications for the enforcement of the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) and the obligations of individuals engaged in foreign lobbying activities.
Background of the Case
The case centers around allegations from 2017, during the Trump administration, when Steve Wynn reportedly informed then-President Donald Trump and other administration officials that China was seeking the extradition of billionaire Guo Wengui. Guo is a Chinese businessman known for his outspoken criticism of the Chinese government. The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Wynn in May 2022, asserting that he should have registered as a foreign agent under FARA due to his actions.
Legal Arguments and Court Decisions
The crux of the legal argument revolves around whether Wynn’s activities constituted an ongoing obligation to register under FARA. DC District Judge James Boasberg initially dismissed the government’s lawsuit, reasoning that FARA pertains only to ongoing violations. Since Wynn had ceased his activities years ago, there was no present obligation for him to register.
Wynn’s attorneys maintained that their client did not engage in lobbying on behalf of China. Robert Luskin, a partner at Paul Hastings representing Wynn, argued that the court should uphold Judge Boasberg’s ruling based on a previous DC Circuit decision regarding FARA’s interpretation. Luskin emphasized that the prior decision related to criminal cases under FARA, suggesting a distinction between criminal and civil enforcement.
The Appeal and Its Outcome
The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, consisting of Judges Cornelia Pillard, Patricia Millett, and Karen Henderson, affirmed the lower court’s decision. The three-judge panel highlighted that Wynn’s activities as a foreign agent had long since ceased, eliminating any present obligation to register under FARA.
“Since Wynn long ago ceased acting as a foreign agent, he has no present obligation to register,” the panel wrote. This ruling underscores a key aspect of FARA enforcement: the requirement for ongoing activity to mandate registration.
Government Concerns and Implications
The Justice Department had argued that allowing the dismissal would encourage “gamesmanship” by individuals who might avoid registering as foreign agents if they believed there would be no civil consequences once they ceased their activities. This concern underscores the broader challenge of enforcing FARA and ensuring compliance among those who engage in foreign lobbying.
The decision in Wynn’s favor may have significant implications for future FARA enforcement. It highlights the necessity for the Justice Department to clearly establish ongoing violations when seeking to compel registration. This case also raises questions about the effectiveness of FARA in its current form and whether legislative updates are needed to address potential loopholes.
The Role of FARA and Its Enforcement
The Foreign Agent Registration Act was enacted in 1938 to promote transparency and prevent foreign influence in US domestic policy. FARA requires individuals and entities acting on behalf of foreign principals to disclose their activities and relationships with the foreign entity. The goal is to ensure that the US government and the public are aware of foreign lobbying efforts that might influence policy decisions.
However, FARA enforcement has faced challenges over the years. The law’s provisions are sometimes seen as ambiguous, leading to difficulties in determining when registration is required. Additionally, the distinction between civil and criminal enforcement adds complexity to the law’s application.
Broader Implications for Lobbying and Transparency
The outcome of Steve Wynn’s case may have broader implications for lobbying and transparency in the United States. It underscores the need for clear guidelines and robust enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with FARA. The case also highlights the importance of transparency in foreign lobbying efforts, which can influence policy decisions at the highest levels of government.
As global geopolitical dynamics evolve, the role of foreign lobbying in US domestic policy continues to be a critical issue. Ensuring that individuals and entities acting on behalf of foreign principals are transparent about their activities is essential for maintaining the integrity of the US political system.
Conclusion
The dismissal of the US government’s lawsuit against Steve Wynn marks a significant legal precedent in the enforcement of the Foreign Agent Registration Act. The case highlights the challenges of enforcing FARA, particularly regarding ongoing obligations to register as a foreign agent. While the ruling is a victory for Wynn, it raises important questions about the effectiveness of FARA and the need for clear and consistent enforcement.
Moving forward, policymakers and legal experts may need to consider updates to FARA to address potential loopholes and ensure that the law effectively promotes transparency and accountability in foreign lobbying activities. The case of Steve Wynn serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in regulating foreign influence in US domestic policy and the ongoing importance of vigilance in this area.
References
- Attorney General of the United States v. Stephen Wynn, 22-5328, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
- Bloomberg News report on the appeal ruling.
- Statements and court documents from the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.
Read More