Biden asylum ban, US-Mexico border, migrant policy, immigration law, asylum seekers, border security, US immigration policy, Biden administration, deportation, immigration news
Explore the details of President Biden’s new asylum ban at the US-Mexico border, including its practical implementation, political reactions, and potential legal challenges. Understand what this policy means for migrants and the broader implications for US immigration policy.
On Tuesday, U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration announced a significant policy shift aimed at curbing the surge of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border. This new asylum ban, effective from 12:01 a.m. ET on Wednesday, has sparked extensive debate and speculation regarding its implications and enforcement. This article delves into the details of the asylum ban, its practical application, and the political reactions it has elicited.
What Does the Biden Asylum Ban Do?
The core of Biden’s new policy is to expedite the deportation of migrants who cross the U.S.-Mexico border illegally without granting them the opportunity to claim asylum. However, this stringent measure activates only when migrant arrests exceed 2,500 per day for a week. Given that border arrests averaged 4,300 per day in April, the most recent publicly available data, the restrictions were poised to take effect immediately.
The ban stipulates that these restrictions will remain until daily border arrests drop below an average of 1,500 per day for three consecutive weeks. The last time border crossings fell to such a low level was in July 2020, during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic when global travel was minimal.
Will These Measures ‘Close’ the Border?
Contrary to some expectations, the border will not be entirely closed. The restrictions specifically target migrants crossing between official ports of entry. Migrants seeking to enter the U.S. through legal ports of entry can still do so by scheduling an appointment via a government-run cell phone app. Additionally, those applying from abroad through various parole programs initiated by the Biden administration or holding temporary work visas will be permitted entry.
Exemptions to the ban include unaccompanied minors, individuals facing serious medical or safety threats, and victims of trafficking. Legal trade and travel across the U.S.-Mexico border will also continue unaffected.
How Will This Work in Practice?
Several operational questions remain about how the asylum ban will be implemented. The administration has yet to clarify how it will manage the swift deportation of migrants from distant or uncooperative countries. Additionally, the number of non-Mexican migrants Mexico will accept under the new enforcement regime is uncertain.
In Tijuana, Mexico—across from San Diego, California—local officials and shelter directors express concerns about their limited capacity to safely house an increased number of migrants.
Will the Ban Be Challenged in Court?
Legal challenges are almost certain. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has already indicated its intention to sue, recalling previous legal battles against similar asylum bans implemented by former President Donald Trump. Civil and immigrant rights groups are likely to argue that the new policy violates both U.S. and international asylum laws.
Why Is Biden Doing This Now?
Biden’s move comes after months of unsuccessful attempts to pass a Senate bill that would bolster border security, including provisions similar to his recent executive actions. The bipartisan bill faced Republican opposition, particularly after Trump voiced his disapproval.
With immigration being a critical issue in the upcoming U.S. presidential elections in November, Biden’s new policy is seen as a strategic response to bolster his stance. A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in mid-May revealed that registered voters favored Trump’s immigration policy over Biden’s by a 17-percentage-point margin.
Despite a recent decrease in border crossings, attributed partly to increased enforcement by Mexico, Biden acknowledged in his asylum ban proclamation that significant operational challenges persist due to the ongoing movement of people in the hemisphere.
How Are Republicans and Democrats Reacting?
The asylum ban has polarized opinions along party lines. Republicans generally oppose Biden’s immigration policies, with many criticizing the new restrictions as politically motivated and insufficient. Trump’s campaign issued a statement condemning Biden for high levels of illegal immigration and criticized the exemption for unaccompanied minors, suggesting it would encourage child trafficking. Trump also dismissed the move as mere posturing ahead of the candidates’ scheduled debate on June 27.
Within the Democratic Party, reactions are mixed. Liberal lawmakers have criticized Biden, arguing that the asylum ban undermines American values and risks returning people with legitimate asylum claims to harm. For instance, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla from California stated that Biden’s order “undermined American values” and would result in “people with legitimate asylum claims being prevented from seeking safety and returned to harm.”
Conversely, moderate Democrats have praised the move as necessary for maintaining order at the border. U.S. Representative Ruben Gallego from Arizona, who is running for a U.S. Senate seat, described the policy as “a step in the right direction.”
What’s Next?
On a call with reporters, U.S. officials declined to provide specifics on how they would handle the increased number of deportations or the treatment of families, who are currently not detained after being arrested at the border. The administration faces the challenge of balancing the enforcement of the new policy with legal and humanitarian considerations, amid expected court battles and political scrutiny.
Conclusion
President Biden’s new asylum ban represents a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy, aimed at addressing the surge of migrants at the southern border. While the policy intends to deter illegal crossings and manage border security more effectively, it has sparked a wave of legal, political, and humanitarian concerns. The coming weeks and months will reveal how this policy unfolds in practice and whether it withstands the anticipated legal challenges.
Read More-